Requirements

1. Lotus Domino Access for Microsoft Outlook (DAMO) Interim Fix 6 – This is the IBM developed plug-in for Outlook that will do all the work.
2. Outlook - I have only tested this with Outlook 2010.

Setup Guide

1. Download (See link above) and install DAMO.
2. During installation you will be asked for the following information:
   • Lotus Domino Server Name – In Lotus Notes 8 go to File->Locations->Manage Locations->Edit->Servers. For example, for me the server was d23ml006/23/m/ibm. Note that I had to remove the appended slashes to get the following: d23ml006.
   • Lotus Notes ID File – This is essentially your user profile. Its location will depend on where Lotus Notes is installed for you. For example, for me it was in C:\Notes\Data\myUsername.id. If you still can’t find it, do a search for *.id.
3. The installation will create a MAPI profile for Outlook to use, which is basically a collection of settings for talking to your Lotus Domino server.
4. Start Outlook and select the newly created MAPI profile.
   • Note: If you get an error that Outlook cannot access a file, it is because in Windows 7 you must elevate Outlook to administrator. You can do this by right clicking on the Outlook icon in the start menu, and selecting properties->compatibility, and checking the “Run this program as an administrator” checkbox. Please note that running Outlook as an administrator is a bad idea in general, so please set this option back to normal once you have completely setup DAMO.
5. The DAMO plugin will launch another setup process and retrieve mails and other settings from your domino server.
   • Note: You may find that DAMO will not download all of your data or stop. This is ok. It often takes several restarts of Outlook to fully download all of your data. Be patient.
6. Close Outlook if requested.
7. Done! Enjoy a new life free of email evil!

Known Issues

• If you are an IBM employee, certain emails that access the Domino databases such as Payroll and Claim receipts will not render in Outlook. It is suggested that if you want to keep these emails that you open Notes and print the email to PDF and store it elsewhere.

A few months ago a client came in from another part of the business and had an issue where the DHCP server appeared to not have given the PC any DNS entries. This of course was a big problem – DNS is critical to any PC wanting to talk outside of its own broadcast domain. I only had limited time to find a solution to the issue so I had to put together a work-around before coming to the root cause. The work-around was simple enough – Manually supply the DNS addresses and move on. But before the client left I managed to take a Wireshark packet capture of the DHCP event, and sure enough the DNS server addresses were definitely in both the DHCP offer and client response. So something was wrong with the clients’ PC.

All my research turned up was people with similar issues and no real pattern other than a certain sub-set of NIC chipsets. So when I saw it pop up again this week on a HP workstation I immediately got excited about the possibility of nailing this bastard of a problem. I recorded the NIC chipset details and went to work on isolating the issue. I first had to make sure this was really the weird DHCP problem described earlier – I made sure it wasn’t some DHCP scoping problem or an AD group policy of some sort, and finally I did a Wireshark capture. Sure enough, the DNS server addresses were definitely in there. So again, the PC knew about the DNS server address, but it just didn’t apply them. Why?

Luckily, after a lot of Googling I believe I’ve found the fix…

The Root Cause

The root cause appears to be Windows XP SP3. Take special note of ‘SP3′, as it appears to be the only service pack affected. The other contributor is the Lucent QIP DHCP server application – Although there are reports of other DHCP servers causing the same issue, it seems QIP is the largest one affected. Here is an excerpt from the MS Forums explaining the issue:

The investigation shows that the position of the option 43 in the packet seems to be the source of the problem. The XP SP3 client assumes that this will be the last one in the list of options. In most of the cases this is present at the end of the list, but with Lucent’s DHCP Server this option can be placed anywhere in the list of options. That seems to be confusing the XP SP3 client and therefore some options are getting dropped.

The Solution

The solution is quite simple – The KB953761 Hotfix. Unfortunately MS have chosen not to publicly publish this hotfix for whatever reason and you have to contact them directly here.

For me, the real solution is to upgrade the DHCP server – Seriously, if you’re having this issue I’m 95% sure your DHCP server is WAY to old to be in service now. Some people might ask – Why upgrade the DHCP service if its MS’s fault? Sure, but chances are you’re organization is wasting more money keeping the thing managed and alive.

Sources

Discussion of issue on MS Forums.

Knowledgebase Article and Solution.

As I began the 6th and last series of the 3D Buzz tutorials – Creating a 3D OpenGL engine – I decided I’d like to focus less on the core mathematics of displaying pixels and more on the creation and design of actual games. I’m not a very good mathematician after-all, and getting into that kind of stuff requires low-level efficient code. Code I really don’t have the skill to write just yet.

So I started looking around for graphics engine libraries that’ll allow me to focus on the game itself. There are a startlingly huge number of graphics engines out there, both free and not, and while I went through quite a damn few I want to talk about just one.

Leadwerks

http://www.leadwerks.com

I’ve been using the Leadwerks engine for about 6 months now and I’m loving it. Why?

1. The Engine – Built from the ground up to be a user-friendly and complete package. Modelled after the Crytek Crysis engine, it has all the features one could possibly need for both a wide-open game (Like Crysis) or an in-doors game, complete with a real-time sandbox editor. I think what I love most is that it is a very OO-centric engine. The code is just so clean and easy to understand – The huge plus for someone starting out like me.
2. Documentation - The documentation is all built up on a very-well organised and clean wiki, which you can freely browse for yourself. Josh, the creator, has made video tutorials for almost all aspects of the engine. This means you can pretty much just jump in, follow the tutorials, and you WILL have a running game in under a day.
3. Community - The Leadwerks forums, also freely available, is a small but very helpful community. Josh, the creator, is often on there as well. You’ll find that any questions will be answered in under a day.
4. Cost - One of the more problematic issues about Leadwerks. The cost is $100US upfront. Meaning you need to dish out early to really start. On the other hand, once you pay the initial fee you’re done. You get the engine for life, including any updates, and you can do whatever you want with your application. Which makes this engine one of the cheapest going around.

All in all, Leadwerks seems to be the perfect engine for someone who has a basic understanding of OO C++ and would like to dive into game development. Although the initial $100US fee can be a bit daunting for some, I highly recommend it.

What You’ll Need

• The Scribblenauts NDS image file: Downloaded from your favourite torrent search engine.
• An Emulator, of which there are currently two options. There are reported problems for both of them so you’ll need to find the one that works best for you:
  • Note: The following has been tested on Windows XP and Windows 7.
  • NO$GBA 2.6a – Old but very good emulator. Very basic. Reported problems with Scribblenauts:
    • Very low quality crackly sound.
    • There appears to be a subtle dull blue hue over the screen.
  • DeSmuME 0.9.4 - Another mature emulator. Has many options including the nice ability to increase the size of the screen. Reported problems with Scribblenauts:
    • The sky appears to be the wrong color (white instead of blue) – It may not be displaying all the layers.

Instructions (Using DeSmuME)

1. Open DeSmuME 0.9.4 change the following settings:
   1. Config -> 3D Settings -> Choose SoftRasterizer as the Renderer.
   2. Config -> Emulation Settings -> Tick Use 8MB debugger mode when starting execution.
   3. Done! Reload the cartridge and play!

Instructions (Using NO$GBA)

1. Open NO$GBA 2.6a and run Scribblenauts, then change the following settings:
   1. Options -> Emulation Settings -> Change NDS Cartridge Backup Media to EEPROM 64KBytes.
   2. Options -> Save Options.
   3. Done! Reload the cartridge and play!

Always looking for feedback – Have you had success? Failure?

You Will Need

• Dungeon Keeper 2 - Obviously very hard to come by in legit form, so I think it is OK (Read: Still not legal) to leech from somewhere. Get it / buy it, then patch it:
  • Patch to v1.7 – DK2 needs to be patched to v1.7, the latest and last update. That too can be understandably hard to come by, so get your Google on.
• (Recommended) Dungeon Keeper 2 (Silver Edition) – The full DK2 game, but packed full of all 3 bonus packs, pre-patched to v1.7 and installs without a hitch. All thanks some some random die-hard fan. Can be found on many torrent trackers.

Instructions

Step 1. Install DK2 and update it to v1.7 if you need to. Attempting to run DK2 now should result in a crash to desktop.

Step 2. Right-click the DK2 desktop shortcut and click Properties. Click on the Compatibility tab and tick Run this program in compatibility mode for: and choose Windows XP (Service Pack 2). Apply and close the window.

Step 3. Launching DK2 now should get you in game. It appears that for some people that is all that needs to be done. But for me, and I suspect this is graphics card based, I get rather bad graphical artifacts in the form of pure black elements covering most of the screen. If you get these issues or similar, complete the 4th step.

Step 4. Go in game and proceed to the Graphics Options. Within this menu will be a Hardware Acceleration option. Disable it. OK out of the options and play a quick game such as the Pet Dungeon game mode. The reason for this is that the game doesn’t appear to save the options unless you go all the way in game and back out. Once in game, quit immediately and restart DK2.

Done! That is all there is to it.

This all works great, but my game crashes out randomly!

Tips:

• Running a dual monitor configuration? Try disabling your secondary monitor.
• Use Quick Save (ctrl+S) and Quick Load (ctrl+L) religiously.
• A known crash point is when dropping human NPCs in Pet Dungeon mode.

Please feel free to offer any feedback if you are still having issues.

You will need:

• GTA: Chinatown Wars – Probably worth buying legit and then ripping to the HDD. Or don’t. Pick up the game from somewhere. I guess just make sure it is in NDS format.
• No$gba Emulator 2.5c – This emulator works almost ‘out-of-the-box’ for GTA:CW. Apparently DeSmuME works as well if you manually compile the latest version straight from the SVN.

Instructions:

Step 1. Load up No$gba and go to Options > Emulation Setup. Change NDS Cartridge Backup Media to FRAM 32KBytes. Hit OK.

Step 2. Go to Options > Save Options to save the options permanently.

Step 3. You’re done! Drag ‘n’ drop the game in or open it from the File menu. Simple as that!

But some time ago Google forcefully rolled out a new version with the Canvas View feature, which adds a tab bar down the left hand side and makes a lot of the gadgets capable of maximizing to the width of the page without having to actually load a new page. It is very cool in some respects and I’m sure many people simply love its usefulness. I am not one of those people.

I only have a few gadgets installed on my page so the whole concept of tabs is not at all useful for me, and I rarely if ever want to maximize any of those gadgets. Therefore iGoogle wastes a lot of screen real-estate. Above and beyond that, there is just other small bloat creep that one does not need nor want to see:

Its all really not a big issue in the scheme of things, but every time I’ve looked at my homepage for the past few months it has irked me. And for whatever reason this morning I just couldn’t stand it any longer and decided to rectify the issue. I spent some time Googling about, uhm, iGoogle, and I found very little other than various forum threads dedicated to the same problem I have.

But luckily I have a brain, and even more luckily I used it quite well for how early it was in the morning! So here is how I managed to remove the bloat:

What you will need:

• Firefox – This only works in Firefox, so make the move if you haven’t already.
• Adblock Plus Plug-in – The Firefox plug-in that does all the work.
• (Optional) Firebug Plug-in – A Firefox plug-in that greatly assists in finding the code elements you want to remove.

The Concept:

The concept is simple. Adblock Plus is a must-have Firefox plug-in that automatically blocks 99.9% of ads that appear on websites. Most of the time it can stop them from even downloading in the first place, which increases page load time. The reason we’re going to use it here is because a. Every Firefox user should have this plug-in installed regardless, and b. It is a quick and simple method that can be easily modified, added to, or reversed at any time.

The Firebug plug-in helped me quickly find the elements I wanted to remove. It is not necessary for the HowTo, but if you want to add your own customizations then use this app.

Step 1.
Install and setup Firefox and Adblock Plus.

Step 2.
Select and copy the following filter code:

google.com#*(personalize_link)
google.com#*(footerwrap)
google.com#*(leftborder)
google.com#*(btnG)
google.com#*(new_user_demo)
google.com#*(btnI)

Step 3.
Open up the Adblock Plus Preferences by going to Tools > Adblock Plus Preferences.

Step 4.
Paste the filter code into the filter list by right-clicking anywhere in the filter list and hitting Paste.

Done! Your iGoogle page should now be Bloat Free(tm), like so:

Opened up Photoshop CS3 today to find that none of the tools worked at all. No matter what tool i selected the mouse cursor would stay stuck on the hand icon and attempting to use the tool anyway did nothing. I was really quite confused. I couldn’t find a thing on the internet about it at all. I restarted the application several times with no dice. In my frustration I went to grab a drink. When i came back, the Photoshop application i had left open was working just fine *shrugs*. Odd huh?

I took another look on Google about it later and saw a few people discussing it. Some claimed it was a memory issue, some said you needed to reset all the tool and window preferences citing that the preferences file was corrupted. Seems to me a healthy dose of time is all it needs. My guess is that the thread managing the tools got held up doing something trivial such as looking for updates over the net.

Anyhow, thought I’d shout it out as i was pretty annoyed over it at the time.

Intro

I’ve wanted one of these badboys for a very long time now, ever since i saw one sitting in a glass case at The Crown in Melbourne. For a long time i looked around various places that managed to get the Terminator license and produce them. I looked, and stared, and i walked away after seeing the price. But last month i committed the cash and went shopping. I’ll tell you one thing right now – The guys at Sideshow Toys make top notch stuff. Everything I’ve heard of them has been positive (and i did a lot of research). But above all that, the Terminator skull just looked correct. There are quite a few brands and versions of this bust out there, and many just look plain bad.

Its a funny thing about faces. There are so many features and facets in a face. So many subtle things that if not correct, can completely ruin the design and look. And although the Terminator endoskeleton is less of a face and more of a skull, it is no different. Stan Winston’s (RIP) design was perfection. I won’t try to explain it, as i don’t think words can really do it justice. But you should be a little freaked out by it, a little scared, and know that you wouldn’t ever want one walking at you. If you feel that, then its Stan Winston’s Terminator. But enough of that, lets talk about the model.

Sideshow currently ships two versions of the life size bust – A chrome version and a combat version. The chrome version is obviously just that, chrome. It looks fantastic in the pictures and I’ve seen user reviews of it in a normal environment. People have complained that in some light conditions the chrome gives off a bit of a rainbow effect on the dome of the skull (like you see in oil on the road). The chrome can also drown out model detail if its reflecting a detailed environment. Either way, i was forced to buy the Combat version instead as the chrome one was sold out indefinitely at the time (and still is). Over all i think this was the better choice in the end as the battle damaged look does bring out more of the skulls features in my opinion, and hell, if i have a change of heart i can apparently wipe the paint off with alcohol (Though i am not recommending that!). The combat version is quite simply the chrome skull with some paintwork applied to it to give it a look that it has been on the battle field. There are no physical dents or scratches on the model that i could see.

Packaging

In short, the model came very well packaged. And it was transported from wherever they are in America all the way down to here in Australia, so if damage could have been done it would have happened on this trip.

Starting from the inside – The skull was completely wrapped in gladwarp which i presume was to stop movement scuffing off the paintwork. Which was then wrapped in several pieces of flexi-cushion stuff and put inside a hollowed out block of polystyrene. From there it was snugly inserted into a custom cardboard box and put into a simple thicker transport cardboard box. All of which was covered in tape. I really can’t see how you could wrap this thing up any safer. Oh and the copious amounts of layers made for a bit of extra excitement when opening for the first time hah.

The Model

It should be said straight up that this replica is exceptional. I believe there isn’t a better one available anywhere in the world (For sale). The geometry of the model, is perfect. It is a Stan Winston replica through and through. The angle, or position the head is in is great. The base of the model is one that stays well out of the way of the skull, so as to not steal any of the limelight. And it has a couple of really cool hidden features you might not expect from a replica statue.

First up is the eyes, they of course turn on with the flick of a little metal switch at the back. And the effect is immediate. The red eye lens’s are not just some uniform flat color like you see on most models. These eyes have that grid like texture like right out of the movie. And to top it off, when you flick the eyes off (Terminate him, as i would say) they slowly fade out over a period of several seconds. Just like when he’s crushed at the end of T1. That’s attention to detail for ya. While I’m on the subject of the eyes, they require power to run of course. The model comes with 3 AA battery’s you insert on the underside of the base. I’m glad they went for AA’s instead of one of those hard to get flat watch battery’s.
One odd thing I’ve noticed is that the eyes seem to dim quite a bit after being on for some time.  I left them on for a good 4 or so days straight when i first got him and i could of sworn that by the 4th day they were noticeably dimmer. Turning the eyes off and on again 10 minutes later seemed to help, but it looks like the eyes drain battery power quite a bit faster than i would have thought.
Update: 2 weeks in and the batteries are dead. I didn’t have him turned on the entire time either. I suspect some highly quality batteries will last longer, but it looks like you can’t just leave him on for months (or 120 years, for that matter).

Second feature is the ability to pull the CPU out of the skull just like Sarah Conner did in T2, minus the drilling. It comes in three parts. The top ‘lid’ you pull off. Then there’s the serrated insert and finally the CPU embedded in its slot. The model comes with a little magnetic rod you use to easily pull out and replace the insert and CPU. Here is where you start to see some sub-par modeling. The insert is a bit too small for the hole and doesn’t fit snugly. It also feels a bit light and plastic like. I’m hoping they did that so it wouldn’t get stuck or so the magnetized rod could easily pull it out. But i think I’d still rather be given a small pair of pliers to pull it out like Sarah did in the movie, it’d be so much more satisfying.
The CPU chip is even worse. It is a very simple piece of plastic consisting of the 3 primary colors, there is no detail and it feels cheap. The hole itself is also uncared for and suffers the loss of metal from about half way down to the bottom (The rest is a black plastic). I would have happily paid a little more to see this part of the skull polished up like the rest of it, for at the moment it feels unfinished.
On the whole, i am pretty thoroughly disappointed with this feature. It simply does not match the quality on the outside.

The Paintwork

The is paintwork is good. But not great. From afar it looks great. But up close inspection will reveal a more sub-par job. Closest comparison i can give it is as if someone took the spraycan from MSPAINT and painted black dirt spots all over it. That is an exaggeration of course, but the effect is still there. There is an obvious difference in paintwork quality between the SideShow pictures and the real world model, as shown here:

Click to enlarge

Excusing for a moment the amateur photography and different lighting environments, it should be pretty apparent the guys at Sideshow Toys put significantly less work into the paintwork of my model than their window model. For starters the teeth are completely unpainted. My model has been obviously painted with a monotone black airbrush, as opposed to the Sideshow Toys model that has had several ‘dirty’ colored paints applied with considerably more effort and care.

The insert above the CPU is, oddly enough, painted dirty. From a realistic point of view, how it got dirty i don’t know. I would have much rathered a shiny metal insert with a delicate looking CPU. But you get neither.

On the whole I’m disappointed by the paint job. Its clearly not what was advertised and not up to my fanboy standards. I’ll let you be the judge though. More pictures at the bottom.

The Conclusion

Despite the bad things I’ve mentioned the model is still by far the best Terminator bust replica I’ve ever seen and I’d recommend any and all fanboys buy one in a heartbeat. The model isn’t perfect, and I’m not surprised. I believe it would take Stan Winston himself to rebuild the perfect model, or an inordinate amount of time spent by a professional artist perfecting one. AUD $600 (AUD $500 + $100 P’n'H) just won’t get you that. But the model is a work of art and i don’t regret the money spent buying it in the slightest.

Ultimately i want to one day own a fully articulate and 100% metal bust. I’m actually seriously considering building my own. Right now I’m trying to see if i can get a hold of a model (CAD/Maya/Max model) that i can modify and send to a professional metal fabricator workshop and put together my self. That might have to be a blog for another time. But if anyone has any info on doing such a thing I’d love to hear it.

The Pictures